newspaper
legal-news
Hopkins et al v. Peraton, Inc.
26-cv-01580
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
In Hopkins et al v. Peraton, Inc., the parties are engaged in a civil dispute culminating in a motion for summary judgment. The case involves claims brought by Hopkins and others against Peraton, Inc., with the court evaluating whether there are any genuine issues of material fact requiring a trial. The summary judgment motion indicates a critical procedural stage where the court may resolve the case without a full trial based on the evidence presented.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Summary judgment motion
- • Material facts dispute
- • Civil liability claims
- • Procedural posture
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
April 17, 2026
1:26-cv-01580 Doe (J.L.D) v. Salesforce, Inc.
In a legal matter involving Doe (J.L.D) and Salesforce, Inc., the court has granted an extension of time, which allows the parties involved more time to prepare their case. This extension is significant as it provides the parties with additional time to gather evidence, consult with legal counsel, and strategize their defense or prosecution, potentially leading to a more favorable outcome for both sides.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-01580 Hopkins et al v. Peraton, Inc.
In the case Hopkins et al v. Peraton, Inc., the court issued a summary judgment. This means the judge made a decision on the case without a full trial, likely because the facts were clear enough to rule on the legal issues. Such rulings can speed up the legal process by resolving key points early.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.