1:26-cv-01448 Rongzhen Xuan v. Alpha Infuse Store
Case Summary
In the case of Rongzhen Xuan v. Alpha Infuse Store, the court granted an extension of time for the defendant to file an answer to the complaint. The extension period allowed was up to 30 days or less, providing additional time for the defendant to prepare a response. This procedural order helps ensure that the defendant has adequate opportunity to address the allegations raised by the plaintiff without immediate default. The case docket number is 26-cv-01448, but the specific court is not identified in the available information.
Key Issues
- • Extension of time to answer complaint
- • Procedural deadlines in civil litigation
- • Defendant's right to respond
- • Case management and scheduling
Case Timeline
2 events1:26-cv-01448 Rongzhen Xuan v. Alpha Infuse Store
[Default Judgment] (<a href="https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/067134431914?caseid=494718&de_seq_num=72">26</a>)
2:26-cv-01448 Oscar Magallanes v. Francisco Carbajal Ramirez et al
[Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)] (<a href="https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031147491697?caseid=1006398&de_seq_num=35">10</a>)
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-01448 Rongzhen Xuan v. Alpha Infuse Store
[Default Judgment] (<a href="https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/067134431914?caseid=494718&de_seq_num=72">26</a>)
2:26-cv-01448 Oscar Magallanes v. Francisco Carbajal Ramirez et al
[Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)] (<a href="https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031147491697?caseid=1006398&de_seq_num=35">10</a>)