legal-news

1:26-cv-00079 MCCASKILL v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC

26-cv-00079 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case McCaskill v. Universal Protection Service, LLC involves a civil dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant company. The docket indicates the case was filed under number 26-cv-00079. The current status shows the case has been terminated, suggesting resolution or dismissal.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

4 events

Coverage

4 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Employment dispute
  • Contractual obligations
  • Case termination
Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

2:26-cv-01030 BAILEY v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC

The court has officially closed the civil case titled Bailey v. Universal Protection Service, LLC. This means that all legal proceedings and disputes in this case have been resolved or dismissed. Closing the case finalizes the matter and prevents further legal action on it.

info
Other April 14, 2026

2:26-cv-00079 AutoNavigare LLC v. Ford Motor Company

In the case McCaskill v. Universal Protection Service, a notice was filed indicating that a new attorney has officially joined the legal team. This means that the party now has legal representation recognized by the court, which can impact how the case proceeds. Attorney appearances are formal steps that ensure all parties know who is representing whom.

gavel
Order April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-00079 MCCASKILL v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC

The court issued an order to administratively terminate the case McCaskill v. Universal Protection Service, LLC for 60 days. This means the case is temporarily paused without being dismissed, allowing the parties time to resolve issues or complete necessary steps outside of court. Such administrative terminations help manage court resources and encourage settlement or procedural compliance.

info
Other April 13, 2026

4:26-cv-00079 Scroggin et al v. United States Attorney General et al

Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles