1:25-cv-10762 Smith v. Coleman et al
Case Summary
Smith filed a case against Coleman et al under docket 25-cv-10762. The court granted an extension of time to file a response or reply, indicating a procedural accommodation that allows additional time for briefing or response preparation.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
3 events
Coverage
3 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Extension of time
- • Response deadline
- • Procedural management
Case Timeline
3 events1:25-cv-10762 Roldan et al v. Miles et al
In the case Smith v. Coleman and the related case Roldan et al v. Miles et al, the court held a conference to discuss the progress and next steps. This meeting helps the judge and parties coordinate the case efficiently. It matters because it ensures the cases move forward in an organized manner.
9:25-cr-80214-1 USA v. Cole et al
In the case of Smith v. Coleman et al, a verdict was reached involving a related criminal case, USA v. Cole et al. The court issued a notice or order indicating a change in the plea or sentencing status of the defendants. This means the defendants may have altered their plea, such as from not guilty to guilty, or there has been an update to their sentencing.
1:25-cv-10762 Smith v. Coleman et al
In the case Smith v. Coleman et al, the court granted an extension of time for one party to file their response or reply. This means the party has more time to prepare and submit their arguments, which can affect the timeline of the case. Extensions like this help ensure that all parties have a fair chance to present their positions.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-10762 Roldan et al v. Miles et al
Conference ( 21
9:25-cr-80214-1 USA v. Cole et al
Notice/Order of Change of Plea and/or Sentencing
1:25-cv-10762 Smith v. Coleman et al
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 84