1:25-cv-04182 Burnett v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
Case Summary
Burnett v. Marriott International, Inc. et al involves litigation against Marriott International and related parties. The case is currently at the stage of a USCA scheduling order, indicating appellate procedural activity but lacking substantive details on the underlying dispute.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Appellate scheduling
- • Procedural posture
- • Marriott International liability
Case Timeline
6 events1:25-cv-04182 Burnett v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
In the case Burnett v. Marriott International, Inc., the court issued a memorandum, which is a written statement explaining the court's reasoning or decisions on certain matters in the case. This document helps clarify the court's position and guides the parties involved on how the case will proceed.
3:26-cv-00689 CULBERTSON v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
In the case of Culbertson v. Marriott International, the parties submitted a Joint Discovery Plan outlining how they will exchange information during the pre-trial phase. This plan helps organize the process of gathering evidence, ensuring both sides have a clear framework for discovery. It matters because a well-structured discovery plan can streamline the case and prevent delays.
4:25-cv-09746 Firsov v. Marriott International, et al
A clerk's notice was issued in the case Firsov v. Marriott International, which is related to the ongoing litigation involving Marriott International. This procedural update informs the parties and the court about a specific administrative action or development in the case. Such notices help keep the legal process transparent and ensure all parties are aware of important procedural steps.
3:23-cv-06664 Salazar v. Marriott International, Inc.
In the case Salazar v. Marriott International, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals issued a scheduling order, which sets important deadlines and timelines for how the case will proceed. This helps organize the legal process and ensures that both parties follow a clear timetable for filings and hearings.
2:25-cv-01613 Jones v. Marriott International Inc
In the case Jones v. Marriott International Inc, a declaration was filed as part of the court proceedings. This document likely contains a sworn statement relevant to the case, helping to establish facts or support legal arguments. Such filings are important because they provide evidence that can influence the court's decisions.
4:25-cv-08246 Mancinelli v. Marriott International, Inc.
In the case of Mancinelli v. Marriott International, Inc., the opposing party has filed a response to a motion, indicating their disagreement or providing counterarguments. This step is part of the ongoing legal process where both sides present their positions before the court makes a decision.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-04182 Burnett v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
Memorandum
3:26-cv-00689 CULBERTSON v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
Joint Discovery Plan ( 13
4:25-cv-09746 Firsov v. Marriott International, et al
Clerk's Notice ( 37
3:23-cv-06664 Salazar v. Marriott International, Inc.
USCA Scheduling Order ( 123
2:25-cv-01613 Jones v. Marriott International Inc
Declaration ( 35
4:25-cv-08246 Mancinelli v. Marriott International, Inc.
Opposition/Response to Motion ( 48