1:25-cv-02618 MASTORIDIS v. ADHERIUM LIMITED et al
Case Summary
In the case titled Mastoridis v. Adherium Limited et al, docket number 25-cv-02618, the plaintiff has filed an application for a clerk order to extend the deadline for an answer to the complaint. The request includes a proposed order to formalize the extension. While specific details about the underlying dispute are not provided, the procedural motion indicates ongoing litigation requiring additional time for the defendants to respond. The court's decision on this application will affect the scheduling and progression of the case.
Key Issues
- • Motion for extension of time to answer
- • Procedural deadlines in civil litigation
- • Court clerk's authority to grant extensions
- • Case management and scheduling
Case Timeline
2 events7:25-cv-02618 Hammer v. Town of Bedford New York et al
[Memorandum & Opinion] (<a href="https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127139421709?caseid=639648&de_seq_num=266">82</a>)
1:25-cv-02618 MASTORIDIS v. ADHERIUM LIMITED et al
[Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order] (<a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/doc1/119123807692?caseid=566012&de_seq_num=175">54</a>)
Press Coverage
7:25-cv-02618 Hammer v. Town of Bedford New York et al
[Memorandum & Opinion] (<a href="https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127139421709?caseid=639648&de_seq_num=266">82</a>)
1:25-cv-02618 MASTORIDIS v. ADHERIUM LIMITED et al
[Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order] (<a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/doc1/119123807692?caseid=566012&de_seq_num=175">54</a>)