1:25-cv-00791 E.Q. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Case Summary
E.Q. and others have filed suit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and additional defendants. The docket entry is a clerk's new suit notice, marking the commencement of litigation. No further information on claims or issues is available.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • New suit notice
- • Federal defendants
- • Case initiation
Case Timeline
5 events1:25-cv-00791 E.Q. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
In the case of E.Q. et al versus the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others, a status report was filed to update the court on the current progress or developments in the case. This report helps keep all parties informed and ensures the case proceeds efficiently.
1:26-cv-00998 CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
In the case Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the court confirmed that the summons was successfully delivered to the federal defendant. This means the defendant has been officially notified of the lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed. Proper service is crucial to ensure the defendant can respond and the legal process moves forward.
9:26-cv-00268 Tanelus vs US Department of Homeland Security (ICE)
A new lawsuit was officially filed and recorded by the court clerk involving Tanelus against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, specifically ICE. This marks the formal start of legal proceedings in this case, allowing the parties to prepare for litigation. It matters because it initiates the judicial process for resolving the dispute.
3:25-cv-06451 Nordheim v. Department of Homeland Security
In the case Nordheim v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals issued a mandate, which is an official order that typically signals the conclusion of appellate review and directs the lower court to proceed accordingly. This step is important because it finalizes the appellate court's decision and allows the case to move forward or be resolved based on that ruling.
1:22-cv-07038 Brennan Center For Justice At New York University School Of Law v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 82
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-00791 E.Q. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Status Report ( 52
1:26-cv-00998 CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant ( 7
9:26-cv-00268 Tanelus vs US Department of Homeland Security (ICE)
Clerk's New Suit Notice ( 2
3:25-cv-06451 Nordheim v. Department of Homeland Security
USCA Mandate ( 39
1:22-cv-07038 Brennan Center For Justice At New York University School Of Law v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 82