1:25-cv-00487 RATCHFORD et al v. MCKENZIE GROUP, LLC
Case Summary
Ratchford et al v. McKenzie Group, LLC is a civil case in which the defendant has failed to respond to the complaint, resulting in a Clerk's Entry of Default. This procedural development allows the plaintiffs to pursue a default judgment or other remedies due to the defendant's non-response. The specific claims and factual background of the case have not been disclosed.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
2 events
Coverage
2 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Defendant's failure to respond
- • Entry of default
- • Potential default judgment
- • Plaintiff's next procedural steps
Case Timeline
2 events1:25-cv-00487 RATCHFORD et al v. MCKENZIE GROUP, LLC
A new case titled Ratchford et al v. McKenzie Group, LLC was filed under the number 1:25-cv-00487. This marks the official start of legal proceedings where the plaintiffs, Ratchford and others, are bringing a claim against McKenzie Group, LLC. The filing is important as it sets the stage for the dispute to be addressed in court.
1:25-cv-01244 RATCHFORD et al v. AMSTERDAM, LLC
In the case of Ratchford et al v. Amsterdam, LLC, the court clerk officially recorded a default against Amsterdam, LLC. This means the defendant failed to respond or appear in court as required. This matters because it allows the plaintiffs to potentially win the case without further dispute.