1:25-cr-10161-1 USA v. Joysel Mateo
Case Summary
This criminal case involves the United States government as the plaintiff against Joysel Mateo. The docket indicates a federal criminal proceeding, but specific details about charges or allegations are not provided. A note references a deleted document, suggesting some procedural or evidentiary matter was removed from the record.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
14 events
Coverage
14 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Federal criminal charges
- • Procedural documentation
- • Evidence management
Case Timeline
14 events1:25-cr-00106-1 USA v. Lanvin
In the case USA v. Lanvin, a note was filed regarding a document that was deleted from the court record. This indicates that a previously submitted document was removed, which could affect the evidence or information available in the case. Such actions are important to track to maintain the integrity of the court record.
1:25-cr-10161-1 USA v. Joysel Mateo
The court issued an order regarding excludable delay in the case of USA v. Joysel Mateo. This means the court decided that certain periods of delay will not count against the legal timeline for a speedy trial. This helps ensure the trial proceeds fairly without unnecessary rush or delay.
1:25-cr-10131-1 USA v. Flanagan
A hearing was scheduled in the case USA v. Flanagan to discuss a motion filed by one of the parties. This hearing is an opportunity for the court to consider arguments related to the motion before making a decision. Although the case number differs, this event is connected to ongoing proceedings in the related criminal cases.
1:23-cr-10163-1 USA v. Gill-Gonzalez et al
The court issued a notice to reschedule a hearing or proceeding in the case USA v. Gill-Gonzalez et al. This means the original date for the event has been changed, which could affect the timeline of the case. Rescheduling ensures all parties have adequate time to prepare and attend.
1:25-cr-10124-1 USA v. Abdul-Malik
In the case USA v. Abdul-Malik, the court recorded an 'Excludable Delay,' which means a period of time during the legal process that is not counted against the defendant's right to a speedy trial. This helps ensure the trial proceeds fairly without penalizing delays caused by certain legal reasons.
1:25-cr-10061-4 USA v. Cuello-Reynoso, et al
In the case of USA v. Joysel Mateo, the court issued an order related to the forfeiture of property, referencing a similar case involving USA v. Cuello-Reynoso and others. This means the court has decided that certain property connected to the case should be seized by the government. Such orders are important because they help enforce penalties and prevent defendants from benefiting from illegal activities.
1:25-cr-10201-1 USA v. Mullane
In the case USA v. Mullane, the court held a hearing to modify the defendant's conditions of release. This means the court reviewed and potentially changed the rules the defendant must follow while out on bail. Such modifications can affect the defendant's freedom and the court's oversight during the trial process.
1:21-cr-10016-1 USA v. Robles
A hearing was scheduled in the case USA v. Robles, which is related to the broader proceedings involving USA v. Joysel Mateo. This hearing is a formal court event where parties will discuss important matters or motions related to the case. It matters because hearings help move the case forward by addressing legal issues and setting the stage for trial or resolution.
1:26-cr-10106-1 USA v. Watkins
In the case of USA v. Watkins, the court issued an order regarding a request to allow the filing of a specific document. This means the court decided whether to permit the party to submit additional paperwork related to the case. Such decisions can impact how the case proceeds by determining what information the court will consider.
1:25-cr-10426-1 USA v. McCarthy
In the case USA v. Joysel Mateo, the court issued an order related to excludable delay, referencing a similar order in the case USA v. McCarthy. This means the court decided certain periods of delay will not count against the speedy trial clock. Such orders help manage trial timelines while ensuring defendants' rights are protected.
1:23-cr-10119-1 USA v. Lopez-Gonzalez, et al
In the case USA v. Joysel Mateo, a related event occurred involving the case USA v. Lopez-Gonzalez, et al. This suggests a connection or coordination between the two cases, possibly indicating related charges or defendants. Understanding this link helps clarify the broader context of the investigations or prosecutions.
1:25-cr-10331-1 USA v. Bhatia
In the case USA v. Joysel Mateo, a miscellaneous relief was filed, which typically involves requests for court orders that do not fit into standard categories. This type of filing can affect how the case proceeds or address specific procedural issues. It matters because such relief can influence the timeline or conditions of the trial.
1:25-cr-10125-1 USA v. Ojeda-Ruiz
In the case of USA v. Joysel Mateo, the court issued a sentencing memorandum outlining the punishment for the defendant. This document details the judge's decision on the appropriate sentence based on the facts and legal guidelines. It matters because it finalizes the consequences the defendant will face following their conviction.
1:25-cr-10465-1 USA v. Bullock
In the case USA v. Bullock, the court issued an order regarding excludable delay, which refers to a period of time that is not counted against the defendant in calculating the speedy trial deadline. This order helps manage the timeline of the case to ensure fairness in the legal process. It matters because it affects how long the defendant may be held before trial without violating their right to a speedy trial.
Press Coverage
1:25-cr-00106-1 USA v. Lanvin
Note Regarding Deleted Document
1:25-cr-10161-1 USA v. Joysel Mateo
Order On Excludable Delay ( 51
1:25-cr-10131-1 USA v. Flanagan
Notice of Hearing on Motion
1:23-cr-10163-1 USA v. Gill-Gonzalez et al
Notice of Rescheduling
1:25-cr-10124-1 USA v. Abdul-Malik
Excludable Delay ( 73
1:25-cr-10061-4 USA v. Cuello-Reynoso, et al
Order For Forfeiture of Property ( 478
1:25-cr-10201-1 USA v. Mullane
Modify Conditions of Release ( 104
1:21-cr-10016-1 USA v. Robles
Notice of Hearing
1:26-cr-10106-1 USA v. Watkins
Order on Motion for Leave to File Document
1:25-cr-10426-1 USA v. McCarthy
Order On Excludable Delay ( 32
1:23-cr-10119-1 USA v. Lopez-Gonzalez, et al
1:25-cr-10331-1 USA v. Bhatia
Miscellaneous Relief ( 37
1:25-cr-10125-1 USA v. Ojeda-Ruiz
Sentencing Memorandum ( 84
1:25-cr-10465-1 USA v. Bullock
Order On Excludable Delay ( 35