legal-news

1:25-cr-00150-2 USA v. WHITE et al

25-cr-00150 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting White and others under docket 25-cr-00150. A key procedural issue concerns the Speedy Trial Act and the determination of excludable time periods that affect the trial schedule. The court's rulings on these timing matters will impact the pace and progression of the case.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

9 events

Coverage

9 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Speedy Trial Act compliance
  • Excludable time calculation
  • Criminal procedural timing
Advertisement

Case Timeline

9 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

1:23-cr-00125-2 USA v. Zheng et al

In the case numbered 1:25-cr-00150-2 involving USA versus White and others, an event categorized as 'other' occurred, referencing another case, 1:23-cr-00125-2 USA versus Zheng and others. Although the specific details of the event are not provided, this cross-reference suggests a connection or relevance between the two cases, which may impact proceedings or legal strategies.

calendar_today
Hearing April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-10057-2 USA v. Willette, et al

A hearing was held in the case USA v. Willette and others to schedule or reschedule upcoming court dates. This step is important to organize the timeline for the trial and ensure all parties are prepared. Proper scheduling helps the court manage its docket efficiently and supports the fair administration of justice.

gavel
Order April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-10061-2 USA v. Cuello-Reynoso, et al

The court issued an order regarding a request to change the terms under which a defendant is allowed to remain free before trial in the case USA v. Cuello-Reynoso, et al. This means the judge reviewed and decided whether to adjust the restrictions or requirements placed on the defendant while awaiting further court proceedings. Such decisions can affect the defendant's freedom and the court's control over the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-00150-2 USA v. WHITE et al

In the case USA v. WHITE et al, a notice was filed with the court, which is a formal communication regarding the proceedings. Although the specific content of the notice is not detailed, such filings typically inform the court or parties about important updates or procedural matters. This helps ensure all parties are aware of developments in the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-00150-3 USA v. WHITE et al

In the case USA v. WHITE et al, a notice was filed that does not fall under typical categories like motions or hearings. This procedural update informs the court and parties about a development or action related to the case. Such notices help keep the case on track and ensure all parties are informed of important procedural steps.

info
Other April 14, 2026

4:25-cv-12154 National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. v. White et al

A new civil case was filed involving National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, against White and others, separate from the ongoing criminal case USA v. White et al. This indicates that the insurance company is seeking legal action, likely related to the matters in the criminal case. It matters because it shows parallel civil litigation that could impact the parties involved.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-00138-2 USA v. VANTERPOOL et al

In the case USA v. WHITE et al, documents related to Rule 5(c)(3) were received from the case USA v. VANTERPOOL et al. This means that important paperwork, likely involving the transfer or presentation of evidence or charges, was officially submitted between these related cases. Such exchanges help ensure that all relevant information is shared across connected legal proceedings.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:23-cv-02061 ANBEES et al v. HIFTER et al

In the case ANBEES et al v. HIFTER et al, the court entered a default against one or more defendants. This means the defendants failed to respond or appear in the lawsuit, allowing the plaintiffs to potentially win by default. It matters because it advances the case without further input from the non-responsive parties.

info
Other April 13, 2026

1:25-cr-00390-2 USA v. WELLMAN et al

In the case USA v. Wellman et al, the court addressed the Speedy Trial Act by designating the start of the trial period as excludable. This means certain time periods will not count against the defendant's right to a speedy trial, often to allow for necessary preparations or other legal considerations. This ensures the trial proceeds fairly without unnecessary delays.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

9 articles