legal-news

1:24-cv-01596 WEEKES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

24-cv-01596 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In WEEKES v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiff has filed a civil lawsuit against the transit authority. At this early procedural stage, the court is managing deadlines and scheduling as the parties prepare for further litigation steps. No substantive rulings or factual determinations have been made yet. The case remains active with ongoing procedural developments to ensure timely progression. Future proceedings will provide more clarity on the underlying claims and issues involved in the dispute.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

10 events

Coverage

10 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Procedural management
  • Deadline setting
  • Civil litigation initiation
  • Case progression
Advertisement

Case Timeline

10 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-00363 DOYLE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

In the case Doyle v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, a substitution occurred, likely indicating a change in legal representation or parties involved. This procedural update is part of ongoing case management and ensures that the court records accurately reflect the current participants. Such changes can affect the direction or strategy of the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:24-cv-01596 WEEKES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

A new case was filed between Weekes and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. This marks the official start of legal proceedings where Weekes is bringing a claim against the transit authority. It matters because it initiates the process for resolving the dispute through the court system.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01241 ALLEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

In the case of Allen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, a notice was sent to the involved lawyers or parties. This communication likely contains important updates or instructions related to the case proceedings. Such notices help ensure all parties are informed and can respond appropriately.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01199 ROY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

In the case ROY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al, the court received transfer documents from the Superior Court. This means that the case is moving from a lower court to this court for further proceedings. Such transfers are important because they can affect the timeline and jurisdiction of the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01188 BOLDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Documents related to the transfer of a case from Superior Court to federal court were received in the Bolden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority lawsuit. This indicates that the case is moving through the legal system and may now be handled at a higher court level. Such transfers can affect the timeline and procedures of the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01185 GILES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

The court received transfer documents from a Superior Court case related to Giles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. This means that the case is moving from a lower court to a higher court for further proceedings. It matters because the transfer could affect how the case is handled and its timeline.

info
Motion April 13, 2026

1:17-cv-01598 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

In the case involving the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiffs submitted a reply to the defendants' opposition to their motion. This step is part of the ongoing legal process where each side responds to the other's arguments to clarify their positions. It matters because it helps the court understand the key issues and arguments before making a decision on the motion.

calendar_today
Hearing April 13, 2026

1:24-cv-01018 WORTHAM v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

A hearing was held in the case Wortham v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to establish or adjust important deadlines and schedule future court dates. This step helps organize the case timeline and ensures both parties know when to submit documents or appear in court. It matters because clear deadlines keep the legal process moving efficiently.

info
Motion April 13, 2026

1:25-cv-04203 HUNTER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

In the case of Hunter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the defendant filed a memorandum opposing a motion made by the plaintiff. This document outlines the defendant's arguments against the plaintiff's request, which is a key step in the legal process as it helps the court understand both sides before making a decision.

info
Other April 13, 2026

1:24-cv-01176 TILLMON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

In the case of Tillmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the court adjusted the deadlines for certain actions or filings. This means the timeline for the parties to complete specific steps in the case was either extended or shortened. Such changes help manage the case schedule and ensure the process moves forward efficiently.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

10 articles

1:26-cv-00363 DOYLE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Substitute ( 15

Media source 10 hours, 24 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:24-cv-01596 WEEKES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Media source 15 hours, 18 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:26-cv-01241 ALLEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Notice to Counsel/Party ( 4

Media source 16 hours, 9 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:26-cv-01199 ROY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Receipt of Superior Court Transfer Documents ( 6

Media source 19 hours, 31 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:26-cv-01188 BOLDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Receipt of Superior Court Transfer Documents ( 4

Media source 19 hours, 32 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:26-cv-01185 GILES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Receipt of Superior Court Transfer Documents ( 4

Media source 19 hours, 33 minutes ago
open_in_new

1:17-cv-01598 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Reply to opposition to motion ( 109

Media source 1 day, 11 hours ago
open_in_new

1:24-cv-01018 WORTHAM v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings

Media source 1 day, 11 hours ago
open_in_new

1:25-cv-04203 HUNTER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al

Memorandum in opposition to motion ( 17

Media source 1 day, 12 hours ago
open_in_new

1:24-cv-01176 TILLMON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

Media source 1 day, 13 hours ago
open_in_new