legal-news

Herrick v. Shutterstock, Inc.

23-cv-03191
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Herrick has filed suit against Shutterstock, Inc., with recent docket entries including a memorandum endorsement. This indicates judicial consideration of motions or procedural matters. The case may involve intellectual property or licensing issues, given Shutterstock’s business focus on digital media.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Intellectual property
  • • Motion rulings
  • • Digital media licensing
  • • Judicial endorsements
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01375 Duffy Archive Limited v. Shutterstock, Inc.

In the case Duffy Archive Limited v. Shutterstock, Inc., the plaintiff voluntarily decided to dismiss the lawsuit without the court making a decision on the merits. This means the case was dropped by the party who initiated it, possibly due to a settlement or reconsideration. It matters because it ends the legal dispute between these parties without further litigation.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 13, 2026

1:23-cv-03191 Herrick v. Shutterstock, Inc.

In the case Herrick v. Shutterstock, Inc., the court issued a memorandum endorsement, which is a brief written decision or order. This type of endorsement typically addresses procedural or substantive issues raised by the parties without a full opinion. It matters because it provides the court's ruling or guidance on a specific matter within the case, influencing how the case proceeds.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 21 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.