1:21-cv-00890 Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al
Case Summary
Smith and others have brought a civil lawsuit against the City of Chicago and additional defendants in docket 21-cv-00890. The recent order concerns a motion to substitute a party, which may reflect changes in the parties involved due to procedural or substantive reasons.
Stage
Court order issued
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Party substitution
- • Civil rights or municipal litigation
- • Multiple plaintiffs and defendants
Case Timeline
6 events1:21-cv-00890 Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al
The court issued an order regarding a motion to substitute a party in the case Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al. This means that one of the parties involved in the lawsuit is being replaced or added, which can affect who is responsible or who can be held liable. Such changes are important because they ensure the correct parties are involved in the legal proceedings.
1:25-cv-03322 Euring v. The City of Chicago et al
The court issued an order granting more time for the parties in the case Euring v. The City of Chicago to finish gathering evidence and information. This extension allows both sides additional time to prepare their cases thoroughly before trial. It matters because adequate discovery is crucial for a fair legal process.
1:18-cv-00998 Coleman v. City of Chicago et al
In the case Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al, there was a miscellaneous relief event related to another case, Coleman v. City of Chicago et al. This indicates that the court addressed some procedural or administrative matter that may affect both cases. Such events are important as they can influence how the cases proceed or are managed.
1:13-cv-04531 Perez v. City of Chicago, et al.
In the case Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al, the court granted an extension of time related to the Perez v. City of Chicago case. This means the parties involved were given more time to complete certain legal actions or meet deadlines. Extensions like this help ensure that all parties have adequate time to prepare, which can affect the progress and outcome of the case.
1:25-cv-15081 Beat Kitchen on the Riverwalk, LLC v. City of Chicago et al
In the case Beat Kitchen on the Riverwalk, LLC v. City of Chicago, the court issued an order regarding a request to submit a document that exceeded the page limit. This means the court considered whether to allow additional pages beyond the usual restriction, which can affect how much information the parties can present. Such decisions impact the thoroughness of legal arguments and the court's management of case materials.
1:25-cv-09679 Bell v. City Of Chicago et al
In the case Bell v. City of Chicago, the court issued a Protective Order. This order is designed to safeguard sensitive information during the legal process, ensuring that confidential details are not improperly disclosed. Such orders help maintain privacy and fairness in the litigation.
Press Coverage
1:21-cv-00890 Smith et al v. The City of Chicago et al
Order on Motion to Substitute Party ( 165
1:25-cv-03322 Euring v. The City of Chicago et al
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 55
1:18-cv-00998 Coleman v. City of Chicago et al
Miscellaneous Relief ( 425
1:13-cv-04531 Perez v. City of Chicago, et al.
Extension of Time ( 574
1:25-cv-15081 Beat Kitchen on the Riverwalk, LLC v. City of Chicago et al
Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ( 52
1:25-cv-09679 Bell v. City Of Chicago et al
Protective Order ( 73