1:13-cv-08916 Baez et al v. New York City Housing Authority
Case Summary
Baez et al. filed a lawsuit against the New York City Housing Authority, with proceedings ongoing as indicated by recent motions for extensions of time. The case involves procedural developments that suggest active litigation but lacks detailed public information on substantive claims or defenses.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
3 events
Coverage
3 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Procedural extensions
- • Litigation timeline management
- • Housing authority liability
Case Timeline
3 events1:25-cv-06355 Samaroo v. New York City Housing Authority et al
A conference was held in the case Samaroo v. New York City Housing Authority, which is related to the earlier case Baez et al v. New York City Housing Authority. This meeting was likely to discuss case management or procedural issues to move the case forward efficiently. Such conferences help ensure that both parties are aligned on timelines and next steps.
1:25-cv-05126 Black v. New York City Housing Authority
In the case Black v. New York City Housing Authority, the court granted an extension of time. This means one party was given more time to meet a deadline, which can affect the pace and preparation of the case. Extensions are common and help ensure fairness by allowing adequate time for legal processes.
1:13-cv-08916 Baez et al v. New York City Housing Authority
In the case Baez et al v. New York City Housing Authority, an unspecified procedural event took place without detailed description. This event is part of ongoing litigation involving residents and the housing authority, which may affect housing policies or residents' rights. Understanding these proceedings helps track the progress and potential outcomes of the case.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-06355 Samaroo v. New York City Housing Authority et al
Conference ( 40
1:25-cv-05126 Black v. New York City Housing Authority
Extension of Time ( 40