legal-news

0:26-cv-61060 Bustinza Martinez v. Mullin et al

26-cv-61060 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Bustinza Martinez v. Mullin et al is a civil case identified by docket number 26-cv-61060. The case record includes an appearance pro hac vice, indicating that an attorney not regularly admitted to the court has been granted permission to participate in the case. Specific details about the claims or parties involved are not provided.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

7 events

Coverage

7 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Attorney appearance
  • Civil procedure
  • Pro hac vice admission
Advertisement

Case Timeline

7 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

0:26-cv-61060 Bustinza Martinez v. Mullin et al

In the case Bustinza Martinez v. Mullin et al, a notice was filed indicating that a new attorney has officially entered the case to represent one of the parties. This means the court and all involved are formally informed about who will be handling legal matters moving forward. It ensures clear communication and proper legal representation in the case.

info
Motion April 14, 2026

7:25-cv-09287 Bondex Insurance Company v. Mullen et al

In the case of Bondex Insurance Company v. Mullen et al, a memorandum of law was submitted to support a legal position, although it was not tied to a specific motion. This document provides the court with detailed legal arguments relevant to the case, helping to clarify the issues at hand. Such submissions assist the judge in understanding the parties' perspectives and can influence the direction of the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

0:26-cv-61022 HERNANDEZ SIERRA v. MULLIN et al

In the case of Hernandez Sierra v. Mullin et al, an attorney was granted permission to participate in the case despite not being licensed in the jurisdiction, a process known as 'pro hac vice.' This allows the attorney to represent a party temporarily, ensuring the client has access to their chosen legal counsel. This step is procedural but essential for maintaining the fairness of legal representation.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-02981 Duarte Guadron et al v. Mullin et al

In the case of Duarte Guadron et al v. Mullin et al, a request was made to issue a summons, which is an official document that notifies the defendants about the lawsuit and requires their response. This step is crucial as it formally initiates the legal process against the defendants. Without the summons, the defendants would not be legally compelled to participate in the case.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-03029 Rahman v. Mullin et al

In the case Rahman v. Mullin et al, a Civil Cover Sheet was filed, which is a standard document used to provide basic information about the lawsuit. This step is part of the initial paperwork required to formally start the legal process. It matters because it helps the court organize and track the case efficiently.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-22555 Cruz Garcia v. MULLIN et al

The court clerk issued a notice correcting an entry in the electronic case records for the case Cruz Garcia v. Mullin et al. This correction ensures that the official court docket accurately reflects the proceedings and filings related to the case. Accurate docket records are essential for maintaining transparency and proper case management.

info
Other April 13, 2026

0:26-cv-61058 Aguilar Garcia v. Mullin et al

In the case of Aguilar Garcia v. Mullin et al, a notice was filed indicating that an attorney has officially entered their appearance to represent a party. This means the attorney is now formally involved in the case and will handle legal matters on behalf of their client. Such notices are routine but essential for ensuring proper legal representation and communication in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

7 articles